Reasoning

Support spotted to the left. Entry at the break of candle off the rejected on the 50/200 Ema to the upside. Countertrend trade made it a bit riskier but support and 200ema lined up. Targeted a 2:1 but moved Stoploss up to 1:1 and got wicked out.

AI Analysis

Valid setup with genuine confluence (support + 200 EMA alignment) and disciplined 1:2 R:R, but countertrend entry without clear higher timeframe confirmation weakens conviction. The trader acknowledges the risk but doesn't explain why countertrend was justified here. Moving SL to 1:1 mid-trade suggests uncertainty about the setup's strength.